Nursing - team working for presentation paper Essay

Nursing - team working for presentation paper - Essay ExampleThe forming percentage point is characterized by civil interaction designed to test the waters and establish trust (Team Development Onlin, 2008). Our team began like this. We had to get to know each other to determine roles and assignments nevertheless initi solelyy it seemed that none of us in reality stepped up to take control of the throng. We were definitely being polite but not very productive. This was an awkward stage for us and we each struggled to establish ourselves in the group.During our forming stage we had to decide when and how we were going to recreate together. As a mother, I seemed to have the least flexible schedule. It was close to impossible to find a time that would work for me and the other group members.I appreciated that they were willing to accommodate my needs for meeting times. This problem surprisingly seemed to pull us together as we struggled to find a solution to our meeting time pro blem. We had to be innovative in our approach (Goldratt, 1992). It was decided that we had to meet together physically at least a few times to put together the elements of our presentation but we all felt that we were responsible tolerable to accomplish quite a twat in between meetings, via e-mail, chat room and cell phone. This turned out well and was a successful soloution to a problem that surfaced early. Storming is the next stage of team development. This is where members usually test and challenge each other and it is where leadership typically begins to form (Clinotn, Lunny, 1997). At first we all were fairly reluctant to take on a leadership role. According to Levi this is often because many team members in the early stages dont want to be determine as pushy or bossy (2007). During this phase of our group during our initial contacts I often found myself in the role of leader which surprised me. In looking at the ages of our group members I realized that in fact I was the oldest and that the team seemed to be naturally looking to me for direction. Some group theories indicate that often group members re-create dynamics from their family of origin (Neill, 2007). As the oldest of the team, I found myself pushing the younger members, especially the youngest to complete assignments and communicate with the group. There was quite a bit of testing during this stage (Yalom, 1995). We seemed to be testing each others commitment to the project and there were times when one or more of us would have discomfit getting to meetings, getting back in touch or completing parts of our assignments. We all seemed a little nervous during this stage and things aeemed chaotic and unpredictable. patronage some of the difficulties we remained supportive of one another and in the end the chaos of this stage helped our group develop (Shaw, 1961). The next stage we entered was that of norming. It is in this stage that members really begin to trust each, establish their roles a nd begin to be most productive (Blair, 2008). This is where we really began to get something accomplished. We also were getting comfortable with each other and our several(predicate) styles of communication (Cott, 1997). We all had different personality types but by this time it seemed more of strength than a weakness (Delbecq, Van de Ven,1971). We also had different likes and dislikes in the work that was needed for the project so we tried to