Aggressive Driving Should Be Avoided

The main thesis statement of my speech is on why cubicle tele bring forward set strait scream utilisation should be prohibited by brainish. The primary alonet here is to persuade you not to engage in cell phone conversations when behind the wheel, based on the premises that I will symbolize before you. The methodology of this in crapation is compilation of established facts from published mesh resources and newspaper or magazine articles.While cellular phones sire been considered r be luxuries a decade ago, today it is already a reciprocalplace possession for many another(prenominal) individuals. The advances in wireless technology coup lead with high in the public eye(predicate) petition find made cell phones affordable and accessible to many.A 2004 MIT survey flush revealed that the cell phone is the invention that people hate the more or less but cant live without, beating out the alarm time and television. Furthermore, in a 2005 University of Michigan study, 8 3 per centum of respondents said cell phones open made life easier, choosing it over the internet (Leo pars. 1-2).The Nationwide reciprocal Insurance Co. released a January 2007 estimate that out of the 231 million Americans who owned cellular phones, an astonishing 73 percent of 1, 200 number one woods with cell phones wontd them bit driving. Moreover, the use of cell phones date driving was highest among young drivers (Insurance Information demonstrate, Inc. par. 3).Another study made by the Insurance Institute claimed that those who used cell phones charm driving were four time more likely to get into crashes just enough to cause injury. This was backed up by the Virginia technical school transit Institute who put distraction as the second most keep going cause of accidents next to fatigue (Leo par. 5).Studies about cell-phone use while driving have focused on several different aspects of the problem. Some have looked at its prevalence as the leading cause of driver distraction. Others have looked at the different chances associated with hand-held and hands-free devices. Still others have focused on the seriousness of injuries in crashes involving cell-phone users and the demographics of drivers who use cell phones.I fully support public natural rubber advocates who argon one in saying that while no information directly correlates road accidents to cell phone use, cellular phones are a major distraction while driving. And the longer you are distracted, the higher(prenominal) the chance of a collision.Let me point out some principal findings in a study which are relevant in convincing you that use cell phones can fumble driving. Did you know that those who engage in cell phone conversations while drivingmissed twice as many simulated traffic signals as when they were not public lecture on the phone took longer to react to those signals that they did detect andthat these deficits were the same for those who used hand-held and hands-free p hone users (Strayer et. al. par. 9).The findings that motorists who use cell phones while driving are four times as likely to get into crashes serious enough to injure themselves, are also backed up by another study of drivers in Perth, Australia, conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.The results, published in July 2005, allude that banning hand-held phone use wont necessarily improve safety if drivers simply switch to hand-free phones. The study found that injury crash risk didnt vary with type of phone (Insurance Information Institute, Inc. par. 9).Abovementioned data were concluded from findings in an in-depth study of driver safety and cell phone usage which summarized that conversing on either a hand-held or hands-free cell phone led to significant decrements in simulated driving performance. Moreover, the study suggests that the cellular phone use disrupts performance by diverting attention to an engaging cognitive context other than the one immediately asso ciated with driving (Strayer et.al. pars. 10-11).In effect, this data contradicts the laws that permit only hands-free cell phone conversations while driving because their data suggests that it is not the phone conversation itself that is the interference but rather the cardinal attentional processes.Although inattentive driving may include talking to a passenger, eating or reaching for something, supporters of restrictions on driving while use a cell phone say that the distractions associated with cell phone use while driving are far greater than other distractions. Conversations victimization a cell phone demand greater continuous concentration, which diverts the drivers eyes from the road and his mind from driving.Most epidemiological studies to date have found indications of a link between cell phone use and auto accidents, but there is few research devoted to establishing a causal connection between the two.Despite this deficiency, there is much to be touch about regarding t his issue following the release of an April 2006 study claiming that some form of driver inattention within three seconds of the crash attributes to 80 per of crashes and 65 percent of near-crashes.This is supported by the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, conducted by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute and the National Highway Traffic Safety giving medication (NHTSA), which revealed that the most common distraction is the use of cell phones, followed by drowsiness. on that point are two dangers posed by conversing on cell phones while driving first is that drivers would take their eyes off the road while dialing and second, the possibility of being absorbed in the conversation may impair the driving ability of the individual and increase the likelihood of endangering the vehicle occupants as well as pedestrians.The latest research shows that while using a cell phone when driving may not be the most dangerous distraction, because it is so prevalent it is by far the most c ommon cause of this type of crash and near crash (Insurance Information Institute par. 2).A summer 2006 research spearheaded by the University of Utah nonetheless concludes that talking on a cell phone while driving is as dangerous as drunk driving, even if the phone is a hands-free model.An even earlier study by the university found that motorists who talked on hands-free cell phones were 18 percent slower in braking and took 17 percent longer to heal the speed they lost when they braked. Also, drivers using hand-free phones had to redial calls 40 percent of the time, compared with 18 percent for drivers using hand-held sets, suggesting that hands-free sets may provide drivers with a false sense impression of ease (Insurance Information Institute, Inc. pars. 10-11).